“Ovarian Conservation” refers to
the practice of keeping the ovaries at the time of surgical menopause, or
hysterectomy for a benign cause.
Specifically, in this case, to ‘conserve’ the ovaries, one does not take
the ovaries out at the same time as a hysterectomy for a noncancerous uterus or
ovary. Please bear in mind that removing
the normal ovaries equates to castration of the female. While this may seem to
be a severe word, it is nonetheless a word that would be equally applied if we
were talking about surgically removing the testes out of a man. And I just want you to get a picture of what we are talking about here. It's not a simple thing. It's not an easy thing. It is removing the ovaries. I think that is a big deal. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
So how many women in America are
castrated? Well, if 40% of American
women over age 45 have had a hysterectomy, and 60% of those had the ovaries
removed in an oophorectomy, that means that millions of women are
castrated. It is important to know what
an oophorectomy means to you.
In
general, whenever any surgical procedure is to be considered, a written
Informed Consent must be obtained. Competency, or decision-making
capability, is implied, and is a legal term.
Informed Consent is based on the ethical premise that you, as a patient,
have autonomy. This means that in the end, it is your body
and you have the innate right to decide what you want done (or not done) to it.
I
have noticed that if a patient agrees to do what the doctor wants, then all is
well and everything proceeds normally.
But having autonomy means that sometimes, a patient will not make a
‘good’ decision according to the doctors, and will instead opt for an
alternative, or a non-treatment. It is
usually when the patient does not want to do what the doctors advise, that the
issue of Competency comes into
play. This is an ethical issue that has
long been discussed. But the law
presumes that most patients will consent to procedures that will save life or
personal disability. In case you are not
able, an Advanced Directive would
spell out what you did and did not want to be done if injury or illness
prevented you from making your own decisions.
Failure
to provide Informed Consent before performing an operation is a legal term that
is called battery. It is a form of assault, so these matters are pretty serious. In fact, battery is not usually within the
scope of medical malpractice insurance liability, as it is considered to be a
wrong against society. Punitive damages
may be sought.
In
cases of Medical Emergencies or legal Incompetence,
the right for the patient to have Informed Consent is waived, and the physician
may proceed within the boundaries of legal and medical Standards of Care.
The
components of the Surgical Informed Consent as a legal document can be divided
into five components:
1. It must be “informed” in that you have the capacity
and ability to make the decision;
2. Risks and Benefits must be discussed in general, and
3. The Likelihood of each Risk and Benefit must be
described for you as an individual;
4. You must exhibit comprehension after issues are
explained;
5. Your Consent must be voluntary, without coercion,
duress, or negative pressure.
The
Informed Consent document will have the following parameters:
1. The patient’s full and legal name;
2. The diagnosis or reason why the procedure is indicated
3. The name of the procedure in both (a) layman’s
language and in (b) surgical language;
4. The purpose or benefits
of the surgery;
5. The risks of the surgery, including the risks of not
having the procedure;
6. An explanation of the alternatives to the surgery,
together with the risks and benefits thereof;
8. The document should be signed, dated, and Witnessed by
an impartial Witness.
Older
surgeons may be more prone to remove the uterus together with the entirety of
the Fallopian tubes, ovaries, and cervix.
Although the risk of ovarian cancer is less than 1% (perhaps it is
0.45%), up to 60% of hysterectomies remove the ovaries. Some cite the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer
as low as 0.25%, with normal ovaries (Natural 2012).
The
sequelae of surgical menopause must be considered for the woman to
have adequate Informed Consent of risks and benefits. If you are having a hysterectomy and the surgeon is taking out the ovaries too, And you don't know what "surgical menopause" is, ask your doctor.
So
what is a woman to do? The American
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists “encourages women to educate
themselves about their midlife health issues and to talk with their ob-gyn
about their concerns” (ACOG Website,
2012). On this note, women should be aware that laproscopy and ultrasound of
the pelvic floor and uterus are available as diagnostic tools to help assess
whether hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy (removal of ovaries) is
indicated. A second opinion is valuable
and warranted when hysterectomy is considered.
With
a hysterectomy and oophorectomy, the ovaries are removed and abruptly, the
woman is in Surgical Menopause. She does
not have the benefit of gradual hormone loss through years of menopause, like
her older counterparts who do not have surgery. The symptoms of surgical menopause can be more severe and more prolonged.
With
loss of the ovaries, a woman’s cholesterol increases, particularly the
low-density liproproteins (LDL). I like
to think of the “L”DL’s as being “Lethal”, not just “bad”. With an increase in LDL, the surgical
menopausal state makes the woman at increased risk of a cardiovascular event
like a heart attack. Heart disease is
already the number one killer of women in America, leading breast cancer as the
most common cause of death.
Additional symptoms of Surgical Menopause include
depression, hair loss, and osteoporosis.
The subsequent loss of endogenous testosterone production may also
result in decreased libido, loss of assertiveness, decreased appetite, diminished
lean body mass, decreased muscle strength.
All of these factors may be associated with a significant decrease in
Quality of Life.
To
boot, I tried to find one scientific reference that proved that removal of
normal ovaries at the time of hysterectomy decreases the rate of ovarian
cancer, versus women who did not have their ovaries removed. One can imagine that a statistical analysis
can be done, projecting the sequelae if every woman over 40 who has a
hysterectomy also gets her ovaries removed.
The theoretical study suggested that over 1000 cases of ovarian
cancer/year could be prevented. Let’s
put that in comparison with another study, which was actually performed.
There
was a study that compared women up to age 65 for hysterectomy, looking at those
who kept their ovaries, and those who had them removed. They found that in women under age 55 who
removed their ovaries, there was an increased mortality of 8.6% by age 80
(Shapiro 2006). Also, it is thought that
because the uterus no longer “talks” to the ovaries after hysterectomy, leaving
the ovaries in results in less ‘uterine stimulation’. Thus, hysterectomy without ovary removal
actually does decrease the incidence of ovarian cancer by up to 50%. This concludes the matter in the respect of
cardiovascular risk and ovarian cancer, because the ovaries can still produce
small amounts of estrogen, progestin, and testosterone for up to 10 years past
the onset of menopause. So even a small amount of hormone production appears to
be beneficial to coronary artery disease, bone density, and sexual libido. Up to age 65, leaving the ovaries in with a
benign hysterectomy has been a general recommendation since 2005 (Parker 2005). So this thought of "ovarian conservation" is not new, but why is it that it seems so new? Perhaps it is because we are increasing awareness, and ladies, that is a good thing.
Bear
in mind that if you have a history of ovarian cancer in your family, these results
do not matter. It is recommended that
you undergo oophorectomy, or removal of the ovaries. Hands down, no one wants you to keep your ovaries. Also, if you have had breast cancer or have
a family history of breast cancer, getting your ovaries out will decrease your
incidence of breast cancer recurrence.
In
my studies of this issue, I gained perspective of the surrounding issues that
once again, focus on this decision being individual and based on the family
history, age, and particulars of each woman.
The
lifetime risk of ovarian cancer can be 1 in 70. But here's one thing you may not know: Over age 40, the risk of ovarian cancer decreases
to 1 in 100 women (Reichman 2006). This is a significant decrease, so that Age
is an important factor in determining lifetime risk. Put this in comparison
with the studies that show that every 37 seconds in America, some one is dying
from cardiac disease. Women without
ovaries who are not on hormone replacement therapy are at risk of dying from
heart disease and this is not acceptable.
So
this is what I learned:
Age
|
Family
History
|
Risk
Factors
|
Number
of Childbirths
|
Breastfeeding
|
Increases Risk
|
Decreases Risk
|
Over 40
|
X
|
|||||
Hx of Ovarian Cancer
|
X
|
|||||
Several Relatives have Colon or
Breast Cancer
|
X
|
|||||
You used fertility drugs for >
6 mo and they did not work
|
X
|
|||||
Never using birth control pills
|
X
|
|||||
Never having a full-term pregnancy
|
X
|
|||||
Obesity
|
X
|
|||||
Diet high in animal and milk fat
|
X
|
|||||
2 or more
|
X
|
|||||
Breastfed your children
|
X
|
|||||
Positive Genetic Testing, BRCA Gene
|
X
|
|||||
Figure. Risk of Ovarian Cancer for Women.
Ovulating over and over again, with eggs released over and over
again…this is what is thought to increase the risk of ovarian cancer. If you have used OCs for 2 years, you
decrease your risk by 40%. If you have
used OCs for > 10 years, you decrease your risk by 80%. BRCA gene mutations may place a woman at an
increased 40% risk of ovarian cancer.
The risk of “hormonal shock” with ovary removal at the time of
hysterectomy has to be weighed into this major Quality of Life decision. Hx = history; OC = Oral contraceptives.
The
decision to take or leave the ovaries at the time of hysterectomy is based upon
‘absolute’ reasons for removal, such as a history of ovarian cancer in the
family, history of breast cancer in the patient (see Table). Without an absolute reason for removal, it
is suggested that each patient discuss the issues with her surgeon, looking at
absolute risk factors and quality of life factors. Additionally, a second opinion is recommended
for hysterectomy due to non-cancer, and perhaps any major surgery.
Here
is an excerpt from a 2005 Abstract summary of research, by WH Parker, et al:
“Approximately
78% of women between the ages of 45 and 64 years have prophylactic oophorectomy
when hysterectomy is performed for benign disease to prevent the development of
ovarian cancer. However, after menopause, the ovary continues to produce
androstenedione and testosterone in significant amounts and these androgens are
converted in fat, muscle, and skin into estrone. Evidence suggests that
oophorectomy increases the subsequent risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and
osteoporosis and whereas 14,000 women die of ovarian cancer every year nearly
490,000 women die of heart disease and 48,000 women die within 1 year after hip
fracture. PubMed and the Cochrane database were used to identify studies that
examined the incidence of disease and mortality from 5 conditions that seem to
be related to ovarian hormones: CHD, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, stroke and
hip fracture, and also data for death from all other causes. The data were
applied to a Markov decision analytic computer model to calculate risk
estimates for mortality from these conditions until the age of 80. The model
shows for a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 women undergoing hysterectomy and who
chose oophorectomy (vs. ovarian conservation) between the ages of 50 and 54
[without estrogen therapy (ET)], that by the time they reach age 80, 47 fewer
women will have died from ovarian cancer, but 838 more women will have died
from CHD and 158 more will have died from hip fracture. Therefore, the decision
to perform prophylactic oophorectomy should be approached with great caution
for the majority of women who are at low risk of developing ovarian cancer.”
ORDER NOW! Dr. Aranda's books, please click here:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Margaret Aranda's Books:
Face Book Page: No More Tears: A Physician Turned Patient Inspires Recovery
No More Tears en Espanol
Face Book Page: Stepping from the Edge
Little Missy Two-Shoes Likes to go to School
Face Book Page: Little Missy Two-Shoes Likes a Ladybug
From Menarche to Menopause: A Journey through Time
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
References:
ACOG
Website, 2012. http://www.acog.org/
National
Cancer Institute. A guide to
understanding informed consent. National Cancer Institute. 03/24/2006. http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/learningabout/patientsafety/informed-consent-guide/Page2
Natural-Progesterone-Advisory-Network. The role a woman’s ovaries play after
menopause. 2012. http://www.natural-progesterone-advisory-network.com/the-role-a-womans-ovaries-play-after-menopause/
Parker
WH, et al. Ovarian conservation at the
time of hysterectomy for benign disease.
Obstet Gynecol. 2005
Aug;106(2):219-26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16055568
Raab,
Edward L. The parameters of informed
consent. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004;
December 102:225-232. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1280103/
Shapiro
S. Does retention of the ovaries improve
long-term survival after hysterectomy?
The validity of the epidemiological evidence. Climacteric.
2006 Jun:9(3):161-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16766428
To Order Dr. Aranda's Books and/or Pre-Order Archives of the Vagina
please click here: http://drmargaretaranda.tateauthor.com/other-works/
please click here: http://drmargaretaranda.tateauthor.com/other-works/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Margaret Aranda's Books:
Face Book Page: No More Tears: A Physician Turned Patient Inspires Recovery
No More Tears en Espanol
Face Book Page: Stepping from the Edge
Little Missy Two-Shoes Likes to go to School
Face Book Page: Little Missy Two-Shoes Likes a Ladybug
From Menarche to Menopause: A Journey through Time
To Pre-Order the official book, No More Tears, Click Here
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Additional Free Articles by Dr. Margaret Aranda
Medical Disclaimer: Nothing on this website is meant to diagnose, treat, or practice medicine. You must be seen in person by a physician for appropriate and individual medical treatment. If you have an emergency, call 9-1-1 in the USA.
Link Disclaimer: We are not responsible for any links that go outside of this website.
Full Disclosure: Margaret A. Ferrante, M.D. receives no monetary compensation for hosting this website you are on, which is independent and not affiliated with Cenegenics. The information presented is for education and awareness. Dr. Ferrante used to see patients out of the Cenegenics office in Beverly Hills, CA.
Thank you for writing about such a critical issue. My healthy ovaries were removed in 2007 without my consent. My doctor stated he removed my ovaries because of 'hormonal bloating'. I can't begin to comprehend this. I was castrated for something that all women experience - hormonal bloating.
ReplyDeleteSince hysterectomy and removal of my ovaries, my health has declined to the point where I'm now disabled. I can no longer work. Actually, there are a lot of things I can no longer do. The quality of my life has been reduced significantly.
I hope every woman who visits your site will take the time to read this post. You're right about this being an emotional subject... All the more reason why I applaud you for writing about it.
I'm truly sorry for your loss, and I think you represent untold numbers of women. I can't explain what happened, or why. But it's done and perhaps the best thing we can do is to move forward by educating future women about this issue. Maybe together, we can stop this from happening to others; we can tip the scale in the other direction. Even if we help one person, it will matter.
DeleteLet's hope and strive for the best.
Dr. Margaret Aranda
www.drmargaretaranda.blogspot.com
www.girlpowerinamm.blogspot.com
I applaud you for writing this blog! I was hysterectomized and castrated for a benign ovarian cyst at age 50. The cyst had a SMALL possibility of being cancerous. My GYNECOLOGIST of 20 YEARS (not sure he was even present in the OR) and TWO GYN RESIDENTS removed my one ovary and waited for the results of the frozen section. Even though it was benign, they then proceeded to remove my other ovary, uterus, and Fallopian tubes. This was despite the recommendation of the oncologist to whom my gyn referred me who recommended that just the one ovary be removed if it was benign.
ReplyDeleteMy health and quality of life have suffered greatly even though I'm on HRT. HRT is at best a crude "replacement" for what my body did so wondrously on its own. And now I'm dependent on the very system that harmed me. I don't even look the same - I aged 10 to 15 years within a few months post-op (major hair loss and skin aging).
I recently developed back, hip, and rib cage pain due to the loss of pelvic integrity. And the post-hysterectomy big belly / "scrunched" midsection is pretty distressing too! It's been 6 long years and it still consumes me. But that's part of what keeps me speaking out against this horrible injustice and harm against women.
The state medical board ruled that my gynecologist did nothing wrong. My insurance company, Cigna, said that the results of their investigation are confidential. My surgeon is still in Cigna's network so they must find this behavior acceptable. That's not surprising if you read the erroneous Hysterectomy information on Cigna's website. I discovered that the insurance authorization was for "hysterectomy" even though I had absolutely no history of uterine problems (was still having very normal 28 day cycles with normal bleeding as I had my entire life) and the biopsy done as part of pre-op workup was negative. So I'm not sure what was submitted to prove that my uterus needed to be removed...but maybe Cigna doesn't require that proof of any problem be submitted. They wouldn't reveal any information in my communications with them (maybe because it would have been self-incriminating). Ironically, the only problem I had was an ovarian cyst that SHOULD HAVE BEEN removed via cystectomy or, worst case, removal of JUST THE ONE OVARY yet the authorization request said NOTHING about cystectomy or oophorectomy.
I wonder how many of the 22 million women who've been hysterectomized realize that their surgeries were probably unwarranted. And how many realize that their health problems are likely a result of the loss of their uterus and/or ovaries? This realization is tough to comprehend and accept but these women's voices can help us stop this horrific injustice and harm.
It's so hard to know what to say. You must represent many other women who just have not yet taken the time to write. Let's just stick together for now and see what we can do to start making a difference. I'm thinking that maybe I could start asking some research questions so that we can put it into a solid format. It's a start.
DeleteDr. Margaret Aranda
http://www.drmargaretaranda.blogspot.com
http://www.girlpowerinamm.blogspot.com
Absolutely fantastic article and I agree that this information NEEDS to be out there and I'm going to cover this topic in my magazine.
ReplyDeleteWhy thank you so much, Allison Brown. Let's keep talking!
DeleteThank you, Dr. Aranda! Here's a study (one of a number) that shows the harm of ovary removal - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20226402
ReplyDelete"estrogen deficiency, resulting from premenopausal or postmenopausal oophorectomy, is associated with higher risks of coronary artery disease, stroke, hip fracture, Parkinsonism, dementia, cognitive impairment, depression, and anxiety. These studies suggest that bilateral oophorectomy may do more harm than good."
But the uterus also has life-long functions - anatomical, skeletal, hormonal, and sexual. There's a Youtube video titled "Female Anatomy: Functions of the Female Organs" that explains it all.
Yes ~ this is a 2010 Study from the John Wayne Cancer Institute in Santa Monica, California. WH Parker also states "...These studies suggest that bilateral oophorectomy may do more harm than good." Great addition to the content of this discussion.
DeleteDr. Margaret Aranda
http://www.drmargaretaranda.blogspot.com
http://www.girlpowerinamm.blogspot.com
I personally spoke with Dr. Parker a couple of years ago regarding the link between ovary removal and heart disease. He told me that he contacted ACOG and strongly advised them to include the risk of heart disease in their hysterectomy patient information pamphlet. Link to ACOG's pamphlet below.
ReplyDeleteTo date, nothing about the link between ovary removal and heart disease has been added. For this reason, I created a petition via Change.org asking ACOG to disclose to women the very serious consequences of ovary removal (castration). Please take the time to sign my petition. Link to my petition is below.
Thank you Dr. Aranda and Alison Brown for caring about this issue and for your efforts toward educating and informing women about it!
(Note: You may have to copy and paste links into your browser)
http://www.acog.org/~/media/For%20Patients/faq008.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20121130T2044514567
http://www.change.org/petitions/help-stop-unnecessary-hysterectomy-and-castration
This is something that we can do.
Delete